The Buzz: The Right Not to Have an Opinion on Ferguson

I’m tired of the pundits. I’m tired of the pundits pretending to be pundits, especially on social media. I’m tired of most people opining on Ferguson—mostly because their “insight” is anything but. It’s not new, nor interesting, nor does it contribute anything to the conversation.

So when this blog’s editor suggested that I write about Ferguson, I groaned. I’m not sure how I feel about the case. Should the grand jury have indicted police officer Darren Wilson? I don’t know.

I think a lot of people are like me. We don’t know. We don’t know how to answer questions like: “How do you feel about Ferguson?” or “Do you think that Darren Wilson should’ve been indicted?” or “Do you think this should be a racial issue?” But there’s one thing that we do know—that we cannot answer such queries with a simple “I don’t know.”

“What do you mean you don’t know?” some people would respond, before criticizing for not automatically agreeing with them. As a result, we are pressured to form opinions agree with them.

That’s unfair. We all can’t have an educated opinion on everything in life. (There’s a key word in the previous sentence. You know what it is.) Nor should we be forced to.

Furthermore, not everything is as black and white (pun intended) as the loudest people in the room make it seem. And yet, we’re rarely allowed to have mixed feelings about anything anymore, be it Ferguson or food at a new restaurant. We must love or hate, agree or disagree, be on this side or the other. It’s this attitude that needlessly polarizes people.

Frankly, I’m not sure how I feel about Ferguson, other than disturbed by its many aspects. Which does not mean I don’t care. It just means that I care enough to listen to and respect various views but not necessarily form one of my own.

Would Wilson have confronted Brown if the teen were white? Probably not.

Did Wilson have reason to believe that Brown was a serious threat? Probably yes.

Was the shooting justifiable? I don’t know.

Maybe the jury didn’t know either—so I can understand its decision not to indict.

I can also understand the anger over the case, because there are many related issues swirling around race and crime and police brutality, all of which are too complicated to go into here. That’s what the smart pundits are for. (There’s a key word there, too.)

I also understand why people continue to protest. But there is no excuse for more violence. As Brian Willinghan, a church pastor and police officer, told The New York Times,

“I now realize, that we who consider ourselves leaders in the black community can’t just be against racism. We have to also be against a portion of black culture that has become increasingly anti-authority and antisocial to a point of self-destruction. This is an enemy we’ve yet to engage in the black community. But it’s a conversation I think we’re forced to have now.”

It’s one of many conversations we should be having. And while I’m not necessarily ready to join in them, I’m eager to listen.